• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Choral Culture / Choral Ethics: October Ghost Story

Choral Ethics: October Ghost Story

October 30, 2025 by Marie Grass Amenta Leave a Comment


“As a child I loved ghost stories.” Rebecca Hall

During the remainder of October, we’re revisiting some of the staple issues of Choral Ethics. I’ve written a BUNCH about each which remain at the center of Choral Ethics. Today’s Choral Ethics dilemma is perfect for a late October day.

Jacob* contacted me with what he thought was an unusual problem. In fact, it was so unusual; he didn’t have a name for it. I happened to know exactly what he was talking about because I had had a similar problem a few years ago. And, thanks to my millennial sons, I even have a name for it.

What is Jacob’s unusual problem? It’s a bit complicated. He has been organist/choirmaster at a large Roman Catholic parish for about ten years. It’s a wealthy parish, downtown in a mid-sized Midwestern city. He directs all of the adult choral organizations, including an elite one, which sings Sunday morning and at all the significant Masses. His Elite Choir has a quartet of staff singers, and the volunteers are highly auditioned. The quartet is SATB but he also has fine volunteer singers who occasionally sing with the quartet.

Five years ago, Julie*, a new congregant, approached him wanting to audition for Elite Choir. She had a nice voice, but it was bit young sounding and underdeveloped compared to his staff singers. She was an excellent musician but not outstanding. Julie told him she had a BA in music and wanted to use her degree but wasn’t sure how.

The first year she sang with him, she was agreeable. But in the second year, she asked if she could sing Soprano Two when he did five-part music with the quartet. He agreed that first time because his usual volunteer was out for maternity leave. Julie did fine but seemed quite impressed with herself; Jacob was not. He decided until his regular came back, he would give her a chance.

The middle of the second year, a job came across his desk he thought she would be perfect for; a teacher for a “Mom and Me” music class through the park district. Julie had been working in retail and was delighted for the chance to teach music. She applied and got the job.

That’s when things got strange. Julie began not attending rehearsals regularly. He would email her or DM her to find out if she would be singing that Sunday. Sometimes she would respond and sometimes she wouldn’t but then would show up on Sunday as if nothing happened.

Once, she was supposed to sing in a quintet for a wedding but didn’t show for rehearsal. Jacob texted her and told her she couldn’t sing for the wedding if she didn’t rehearse. Julie told him it wasted her time coming to “all these rehearsals” when she was a better musician than the paid staff singers. She did come to the final rehearsal for that wedding but only when he told her he would replace her. At this point, Julie began not showing up for rehearsals on a regular basis. Jacob had attendance rules for Elite Choir volunteers and Julie broke all of them.

Two years ago, he emailed her in August, asking if she was planning to sing with Elite Choir for the coming choir year. If she was, she would need to follow Elite Choir’s attendance rules. He explained it was not fair to the rest of the choir when the rest of them worked hard every week. And, as he was planning for Advent, Christmas and other Holy Days in the fall and winter, wanted to know if he could count on her. No reply. He emailed AND DM-ed her with the same sentiment a week later; NO REPLY. The following week, he texted her and NO REPLY. She seemed to be avoiding him because he knew she still had her park district job. She was attending Saturday evening Mass and of course, she no longer came to rehearsal or to Sunday Mass.

After he explained all that, I told him there was a name for what she did by not replying to his repeated emails; Ghosting. I had also experienced something similar with one of my former singers, which is why I knew what to call it.

Now to Jacob’s problem, Julie emailed Jacob at the end of June asking for a recommendation. She and her husband had moved to a small town outside of that mid-sized city in March and decided to start her own private lesson studio. She wanted something from him so she could use his quote for PR material and a letter she could use for introduction when asked about experience.

Jacob wanted to know what he should do because he doesn’t want to be unethical. He also doesn’t want to give her a recommendation. I told him to do nothing and not respond. It is not unethical. If he engages in any sort of dialogue, there is always the chance she’ll convince him to give her something. And that would not be what he wants. Would he be ghosting? Yes it would.

*Name Withheld

 

 


Filed Under: Choral Culture, Choral Ethics, Difficult Times, Kindness, Leadership, Self Care, The Choral Life

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter
Celebrating Grace
Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Gossip
  • Choral Ethics: Story Time
  • ChoralEd, Performing Choral Music – Kenya – Ken Wakia
  • The Conductor as Yogi: The Freedom of Intention
  • Choral Ethics: Ring Out the Old, Ring in the New….

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy