• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / CJ Replay: Orlando di Lasso

CJ Replay: Orlando di Lasso

September 24, 2012 by Scott Dorsey Leave a Comment


(From the Choral Journal article, “Polychoral Compositions of Orlando di lasso,” by Larry Cook)
 
       Orlando di Lasso is a well-known name as composer of motets, madrigals, Masses, Magnificats, chansons, and German lieder. Somehow he seems to have been largely overlooked as a composer of polychoral music. Perhaps he has been overshadowed by the brilliant compositions of the Venetian school from Willaert through Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli and Monteverdi.  Lasso composed, however, a significant number of polychoral works including thirty eight Latin motets for from eight to twelve voices, with both sacred and secular texts; seven Italian madrigals for from eight to ten voices; five French chansons for eight voices;
and a German polyphonic lied for eight voices. In addition he also wrote polychoral Masses and Magnificats, although they are not included in the “Si imtliclze Werke” “one Mass for double choir which has so far appeared in the “Nelle Reilze” and another, the “ Missa sllper Oscllletllr” which is available in a performing edition from Barenreiter Ausgabe BA 4396.
       Lasso appears to utilize the double choir medium in order to gain greater variety of color and texture, to enhance contrasts inherent in a given text, to present a dialogue (often humorous), or to exploit echo effects. He did not seem to be particularly interested in the “stereophonic” effect of widely separated choirs; at any rate in most of the tutti sections he is not careful to make each choir harmonically complete, in contrast to the normal practice of the Venetian school.
 

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John Howell says

    October 4, 2012 at 11:34 am

    It seems that there’s a fundamental omission in this brief analysis.  Renaissance composers did not write music for publication (although they might later gather compositions together for publication), nor did they have a sense of writing “for the ages.”  They wrote for immediate use, music for which there was an immediate need and quite often a special occasion, in almost every case for singers and instrumentalists whose capabilities they knew qute intimately, and in virtually every case for specific performance locations.
     
    And it is this latter that is missing.  We know the architecture for which the Venetian works were written, and thanks to Michael Praetorius’ instructions to German choirmasters we know how polychoral music could have been used in other venues.  But for which venues would Lasso have written for split choirs?  That seems like a pretty fundamental question!  And one that should PREcede any assumption that “he did not seem o be particularly interested in the ‘stereophonic’ effect of widely separated choirs.”  This music didn’t just exist on paper, it existed in space and time as well.
     
    All the best,
    John
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

 

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Don’t Waste My Time!
  • Choral Ethics: Judging Others
  • Choral Ethics: Doing the Right Things
  • Choral Ethics: Working Together
  • The Conductor as Yogi:  The Calmest Person in the Room

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy