• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / Building Skills 16

Building Skills 16

February 11, 2015 by Richard Sparks Leave a Comment


More from Daniel Coyle: Tip #26 Slow It Down (Even Slower Than You Think).
 
Coyle: "This urge for speed makes perfect sense, but it can also create sloppiness, particularly when it comes to hard skills (see Tip #8). We trade precision—and long-term performance—for a temporary thrill. So slow down. Super-slow practice works like a magnifying glass; It lets us sense our errors more clearly, and thus fix them."
 
Coyle also has a nice post on his blog about called, "Slow is Beautiful," which includes video of golf great Ben Hogan showing how he uses slow practice.
 
This is a critical rehearsal tool for the conductor, but there are various ways to use it. And surprisingly, I see it used infrequently by too many conductors.
 
In a fast passage, at a certain speed some members of the choir will never perceive the pitches (or patterns) accurately. You can practice the passage 20 times at a fast tempo and it'll still be sloppy. But a fewer number of repetitions at a slower speed can allow the singers to absorb the pitches and build them in correctly. The same thing is true for instrumentalists. When I rehearse strings, for example, if the music has awkward string crossings, difficult bowings, or simply calls for extreme speed, the only way to make it better is to slow it down. For both singers and instrumentalists, "muscle memory" must be developed that allows passage work that can be done accurately without consciously thinking of every individual note.
 
With a choir, it also makes it even easier if you take away another variable (text) and sing on a neutral syllable or count-sing (if your choir does that regularly). Since I do lots of baroque music with my chamber choir that specializes in early music, this is always the first tool of choice with a fast melismatic passage or fugue: take away the text and slow it down.
 
It's the same when performing (or learning) an unfamiliar language. I'll usually do a "repeat after me" session when first going through an unfamiliar text in another language. My going too fast only means that the choir can't even perceive the sounds correctly, much less repeat them accurately—and it will waste time, rather than saving it.
 
And sometimes to shape a phrase with subtlety, a slower rehearsal speed allows the ensemble to feel and shape phrases together in a way they can't at a faster speed.
 
Slower can be faster. And slower can much more quickly get the ensemble to a fast, yet clean performance.

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Joshua Oppenheim says

    March 2, 2015 at 8:32 pm

    Yes yes!  I teach the methods classes to “rehearse fast things slow and slow things fast.” Rehearsing slow pieces fast, not only allows us to get much more reinforcement/attempts, but it also often provides a better sense of the melodic/harmonic phrase statement which can be obscured by extended “time.”  It also allows pushes the singers to look ahead and chase a bit more.
    Log in to Reply
  2. Bruce Rockwell says

    March 2, 2015 at 11:57 am

    Count singing isn’t an “alternate text” any more than solfege is. Who among us has to “learn” the numbers one through four?
     
    Count singing is a pedagogy for teaching rhythmic accuracy, every bit as much as solfege is a pedagogy for teaching pitch accuracy and tonal function. It is true that slowing a passage down can help singers sing with rhythmic accuracy. But so can count singing, and it’s not an either/or. We can and should use both tools when they are called for. Moreover, we shouldn’t call accurate rhythms a “foolish sequence,” any more than we should call a pedagogy a “bugaboo” when it produces the kind of results that count singing can. 
    Log in to Reply
  3. william copper says

    February 26, 2015 at 8:52 pm

    Good post!   I hate to see that bugaboo “count-sing” brought into the picture, however.  Consider it logically: you are removing a “text” of some sort, which has to be learned, with a foolish sequence of numbers and -a number, which is a different thing to learn.   Slow the text down, too: break it into consonant, vowel, diphthong, consonant if necessary: THAT’s valuable.   But learning an alternate text of numbers is not a good use of rehearsal time.   (Imho)
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Part Five
  • Choral Ethics: Part Four
  • Choral Ethics: Part Three
  • Choral Ethics: Part Two
  • Choral Ethics: A Five Part Series, Part One

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy