• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / Singing Christian Music (Part I)

Singing Christian Music (Part I)

February 4, 2015 by Joshua Bronfman Leave a Comment


This past holiday season I found myself embroiled in a somewhat heated discussion surrounding seasonal music, parents, and students. The story is familiar to many of us: A Jewish child, in a choir affiliated with the public school system, was performing on my college holiday program. This child expressed discomfort in singing Silent Night. The parents asked for accommodations, which we were happy to oblige (the student didn’t sing with the massed choirs for Silent Night). The parents, however, did not limit their concerns to the nature of our accommodation, but challenged us on the acceptability of our entire musical programming for the holiday season. In essence questioning us on the appropriateness of Silent Night and the emphasis on sacred music from the Christian tradition, while exhorting us to explore a multicultural and secular program.

For the record, I am Jewish. I remember being a part of a “Christmas” program when I was in preschool in the late 1970s. I was very uncomfortable at the time. It felt weird to sing “Christ the Savior is Born.” I also felt excluded, because I really didn’t know most of the songs, and I certainly didn’t know verse two of any of these songs. I knew Jingle Bells, but the other kids already knew most of the other songs.

After that I mostly didn’t perform much sacred music until I started singing in choir regularly in high school. Some of the old feelings came up when we sang works with similar texts to Silent Night. But, I gradually became desensitized to it, and eventually was free enough to explore and examine the meanings and motivations contained within the text, and to use that to inform my singing and conducting. I haven’t been uncomfortable singing sacred music in decades, but I remember vividly the feeling.

Despite my background and heritage, I have become a staunch supporter of Christian sacred music within the choral art form. I think there are a number of points to be made, that aren’t talked about directly, and maybe coming from a Jew might be heard more clearly.

First and foremost: Choral singing is inherently a Christian tradition. It was founded, nurtured, and developed almost exclusively within the Christian church for more than 1000 years. If you participate in choral singing, you are participating in a historically Christian art form. If you chose to sing in a choir, and do it with an accurate representation of the tradition, you will sing a lot of sacred Christian music. There are many instances of secular choirs and choral music, choral music from other religions (including many examples of Jewish choral music), but the cold, hard facts are that the vast majority of choral music throughout history is of a sacred, Christian, nature, and that if it weren't for the Christian Church, we probably wouldn't have choral singing as we know it.

In order to study choral music and choral singing, and maintain any level of accurate representation of the tradition, it is impossible to separate the religious background from the art form. Any attempt to fully separate choral singing from Christianity means that you deny a major portion of the artistic tradition, and deny the students of the art form an accurate representation of what you are studying. You are, in essence, lying about what choral music is and is not.

Imagine you want to study stained glass artwork, and maybe want to become a stained glass artist to earn a living designing and installing stained glass. Now imagine begining your studies in this field, but not wanting to learn about stained glass in churches, for whatever reason. And take that one step further and say that you want stained glass design and installation to be your career, but you will not install or design for churches. The preposterousness of this proposition is almost laughable; you will be one unemployed stained glass designer/installer who knows very little about stained glass!

I understand that there are differences between stained glass and singing, but the fundamental truth of the argument holds up: when we deny that choral singing is a Christian art form, when parents say to the principal of the school “why is the public school choir performing any sacred Christian music at all? Isn’t there enough secular repertoire?”, we are challenging the study and performance of the fundamental artistic creations of the form. To remove Christian music from the holiday program is like trying to earn a living installing stained glass windows on businesses and community centers alone…it doesn’t make any sense.

The response from parents is often that they just want representation, diversity, inclusion, and balance, not wholesale exclusion of Christian music. I happen to agree wholeheartedly with this, because the same argument for including Christian music in the choral program holds for the inclusion of the other types of music: the need for an accurate representation of what is out there in the art we are performing and studying. However, this can be a slippery slope, and when this principle gets distorted, you wind up with the situation we have with Christmas and Hanukkah, which I will address in my next post about this subject.

 


Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Edward Palmer says

    February 13, 2015 at 6:55 pm

    All people of faith
     
    I have an idea. The Winter vacation is usually 10 school days.
    Separate the 10 into groups of two and three. Scatter the groups around the calendar and let each group have the choral thing they want.  ( Why is so much in December, anyway?)
    OR quit with the PC and  sing a beautiful Kwanza song, a catchy Islamic tune and a Hanukkah piece along with the Christ Mass music and enjoy each others part.
    Close with the humming of one stanza of Silent Night.
     
    Not too seriously,
    Ed Palmer
    Log in to Reply
  2. Joshua Bronfman says

    February 13, 2015 at 12:16 am

    I’m not entirely sure what you are saying here, but if it’s “much of this tradition started with Judiasm” then I agree 100% (as do the scholars). But the art form as we know it now would not exist without Christianity, nor would the vast majority of our most significant works.
    Log in to Reply
  3. Joshua Bronfman says

    February 13, 2015 at 12:13 am

    I guess it depends on how you define the word significant. “Great” certainly is one way. So is “groundbreaking” or “innovative.” I think you might argue that Silent Night is neither of those…I might agree with you. But I would argue that significant also means “a part of the canon” and Silent Night is one of the most widely performed and recognized choral works around. It is a “standard” and I would argue that is because it is just beautiful…that is enough to account for it’s popularity, as well as it’s significance….Imagine a K-12 world in which we never sing Silent Night, and many choir singers leave school never having sung it. I think we might all agree that doesn’t make sense. The Simeone is great, but does it resonate with the world in such a pervasive manner?
     
    But, to be fair, I think this is beside the point. As I stated, I’m totally fine with them being uncomfortable with singing the tune. What I object to is the suggestion that we “just sing secular choral music” which is somewhat ignorant, anti-accurate thing to suggest.
    Log in to Reply
  4. George Brown says

    February 11, 2015 at 9:11 pm

    Kudos!   No people group has contributed more to music and the arts than the Jewish people.  Abraham’s descendents have certainly blessed “all the families of the earth” (Genesis 12:1-3), not only through music but nearly every other field of endeavor as well!  Moreover it should be noted that Christian choral music and every other blessing the world enjoys from the Church ALSO flows to us from that same “spring.”  And besides, what choral music do we know of in antiquity than that of the Jerusalem temple?  Though little is known about it, “Christian” choral music has a Jewish source as does Christianity itself!   
    Log in to Reply
  5. Austen Wilson says

    February 11, 2015 at 4:57 pm

    I think one can teach a lot of musicality and vocal technique through Silent Night. In addition, teaching music from Christian traditions (including Silent Night) will prepare students for future musical endeavors. Collegiate and community choirs sing a lot of sacred music and much of it is Christian!
     
    On a deeper note, Silent Night is very important historically. On Christmas Eve of 1914, there was an event that happened in the trenches of the Western Front during World War 1. Either the English or German side started singing Silent Night in their own language. Then the other side started singing Silent Night in their own language. Someone waved a white flag and both sides met in the middle. Unfortunately their superiors weren’t too happy and the war resumed. However, it was a very touching moment during the war. This instance is a very tangible experience of how music can help bring peace to our world. 
     
    In my humble opinion, if someone still has an issue with Silent Night after hearing that story, there are deeper issues than whether or not a choir sings Silent Night.
     
     
    Log in to Reply
  6. Thomas Seniow says

    February 11, 2015 at 11:33 am

     Is “Silent Night” that significant musically, or does it just hold a special place in the hearts of those in the Christian tradition? Your very well-stated argument certainly works for the “Glory To God” chorus from Messiah, but does it work for “Silent Night” or even great Christmas arrangements like Simeone’s “Do You Hear What I Hear?”
    Log in to Reply
  7. Ronald Richard Duquette says

    February 11, 2015 at 9:29 am

    Herein lies the inherent difficulty with “political correctness” – the denial of uncomfortable fact in the name of sensitivity.  I am admittedly a Christian, so my perspective is skewed from the beginning.  Nonetheless, while there are traditions of choral singing from other parts of the world (I think of Africa, in particular – but that is a PARTICULAR form of choral music, not related to the origins of the Western tradition), the PARTICULAR form of choral singing we associate with our own culture is based, as Mr. Bronfman points out, on the choral tradition of the Christian Church – western and eastern.  That these forms have a resonance to ancient Jewish and eastern Mediterranean traditions is undeniable – and yet, they were not CHORAL traditions in the way we understand them.  And, to be historically accurate, “choral” music – i.e., music in more than one part – doesn’t really begin until about 1000 A. D. – or C.E., if you wish.  AND, the development of music in more than one part is a direct result of the Christian Church’s exploration, by its composers, known and unknown, of the possibilities of more than unison singing.  So, if someone objects to sacred music in the Western tradition being included in a program because of its specifically religious texting and use, as Mr. Bronfman points out, they deny the vast majority of their cultural heritage in that regard.  And this is one reason we’re in such trouble as a culture – we deny what’s personally uncomfortable, we reject it, in the hope somehow that this will all go away, that we won’t have to confront the uncomfortable in the name of some specious correctness.  Bravo, Mr. Bronfman; it’s a brave thing you’ve done.  I hope others appreciate not only the fact of the defense of sacred music in a secular context for a fully rounded understanding of the origins and development of the artistic form, but the particular and peculiar perspective he brings to the matter.
     
    Ron
    Log in to Reply
  8. Terry Barham says

    February 11, 2015 at 7:47 am

    Eloquently stated!   Thank you!
     
    Terry 
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

 

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • ChoralEd, Implementing the Challenge System – Travis Rogers
  • Choral Ethics: Don’t Waste My Time!
  • Choral Ethics: Judging Others
  • Choral Ethics: Doing the Right Things
  • Choral Ethics: Working Together

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy