• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / GUEST BLOG: “My Journey Away from Contemporary Worship Music” by Dan Cogan

GUEST BLOG: “My Journey Away from Contemporary Worship Music” by Dan Cogan

January 14, 2015 by Scott Dorsey Leave a Comment


MY JOURNEY AWAY FROM CONTEMPORARY WORSHIP MUSIC by Dan Cogan

I have been what many would call a “worship leader” for close to two decades. When I first became involved in “worship ministry” in an Assemblies of God youth group we sang such songs as The Name of the Lord Is a Strong Tower, As the Deer, Lord I Lift Your Name on High, and others of the era of the 1980s and 90s. Ours was considered a stylistically progressive church since we used almost exclusively contemporary songs.

This meant that if I were to visit a “traditional” church, not only would I be unfamiliar with the hymns, I would also likely cringe when they sang them and in my heart ridicule them (the people rather than the songs) as being old-fashioned.

It was during these formative years in my experience as a worship leader that I began to introduce even more contemporary songs to our youth group. It was then that I discovered artists like Delirious, Darrel Evans, Matt Redman, and Vineyard Music with their songs Did You Feel the Mountains Tremble, Trading My Sorrows, Heart of Worship, and Hungry. 

As a young musician who desired to honor Christ, I found these songs to be particularly compelling. I felt different when we sang them. The way Nirvana gave voice to the angst of Generation X, bands like Delirious were giving voice to a generation of young Christians who didn’t feel they could relate to the songs of their parents and grandparents.

Over the years when I would occasionally hear a hymn, the language was always strikingly foreign, with Ebenezers and bulwarks, diadems and fetters. Which only served to confirm my bias that hymns were simply out-of-date. They had served their purpose. They had run their course.

The problem with my youthful logic only began to dawn on me about seven years ago. I had come to recognize that these ancient hymns accomplished something that the new songs weren’t. While contemporary worship seemed to take the listener on an exciting and emotional rollercoaster, the old hymns engaged the mind with deep and glorious truths that when sincerely pondered caused a regenerated heart to humbly bow before its King.

When I accepted my first post as a paid member of a church staff in 2007, I began the practice of singing one hymn each week. There were times where my peers would teasingly ask what an “Ebenezer” was. What I found was that when I gave them a basic definition of these seemingly obsolete words we were singing, their response was usually something akin to, “Oh? Cool. I never knew that!” I think when they asked, they half expected me to say, “I don’t know! Weird word, huh?” Instead they were being challenged to learn, not merely a new word, but how to ponder the things of God deeply when we sing His praises.

Nowadays, I still choose songs for our congregation to sing that were written recently, but they are becoming increasingly the minority. And the criteria for selecting them is becoming more and more thorough. Hymns have begun to take precedent in my song selection for two reasons.

First, hymns have been sung by the giants of the faith who have gone on before us over the last two millennia. When we sing A Mighty Fortress Is Our God, we join with Martin Luther who wrote it, and with Calvin and Spurgeon and Edwards who invariably sang and cherished it. When we sing It Is Well With My Soul we are encouraged by the faith of Horatio Spafford who wrote the hymn in the wake of the tragic death of his four daughters. And while many contemporary songs have certainly been written by wonderful brothers and sisters in Christ who have surely endured trials, the fact that we can join with generations past and be reminded that the Church is vastly larger than our local congregation, farther reaching than our town or state or country, and much, much older than the oldest saint living today is something we should not take lightly. Indeed, this should birth in us a desire to sing the songs that our Family has sung together for two-thousand years (and beyond when we discuss singing the Psalms).

Second, the content of hymns is almost always vastly more theologically rich. When I say rich, I don’t necessarily mean every hymn recounts the Gospel in it’s entirety, or that all hymns clearly teach the Five Points of Calvinism. Rather, the theology in the hymns is typically more sound or healthy than much of contemporary worship music. As I said earlier, contemporary songs engage our emotions more often, where the hymns engage our hearts by way of the mind.

By way of example, one of the top ten contemporary songs being sung in American evangelical churches right now is called One Thing Remains. While there is nothing in the song particularly bad (in fact, much of it is pretty good), it seems to me that the purpose of the song is to work the listeners into an emotional state. The chorus is:

“Your love never fails / It never gives up / Never runs out on me / Your love never fails / It never gives up / Never runs out on me / Your love never fails / It never gives up / Never runs out on me / Your love / Your love / Your love.”

With the repetition of a simple lyric like that, it isn’t a stretch to say that the composers’ goal was not to engage the listeners mind.

Whereas Augustus Toplady’s hymn Rock of Ages is doctrinally sound, it also is a very moving song of our dependance upon Christ our Rock:

“Rock of Ages cleft for me / Let me hide myself in Thee / Let the water and the blood / From Thy wounded side which flowed / Be of sin the double cure / Save from wrath and make me pure.”

So I make this plea to my fellow ministers, do not neglect these milestones from ages past. In fact, I would make the case for the abandonment of most contemporary songs. If you choose a song for congregational worship based on it’s content (say you have chosen a contemporary song because of it’s focus on the Cross), do the hard work of finding a hymn that more than likely addresses the same topic or doctrine in a much deeper way. If on the other hand you have chosen a song because of the way it feels or the emotion it evokes, ask yourself whether you are depending upon the Holy Spirit or your own skills to engage our brothers and sisters in singing to our King.

(This column is reprinted from the blog Anchor Line with the kind permission of the author.)


Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anthony Doherty says

    February 4, 2015 at 9:30 am

    For one thing, I’ve never been particularly happy with the use of the word “contemporary” in this context, especially to mean a specific style of music or even worship as a whole. Along with many other composers, I write contemporary music that doesn’t involve electric guitars and drums, tambourines, and incessant hand-clapping. It is still the music of the present time. It is also traditional in the sense that it is mostly tonal and uses standard techniques of composition that make it workable and comprehensible, much as spelling and grammar do for writing text. And the texts for my choral pieces  are mostly  scripture, liturgical texts, and occasionaly great theologians or poets.
     
    The bigger problem is using “traditional” and “contemporary” as opposites, perhaps suggesting that the latter implies the rejection of the former. What message are we to take from a church sign that says  “Traditional Worship 9:00. Contemporary Worship 10:00”? Is it an either/or situation?  How does that square with the principle of lex orandi lex credendi (loosely, the way we worship shows or defines the way we believe)?  If we say that we need “contemporary” worship/music because people can no longer relate to the “traditional” forms, where does the probem chiefly lie, with the forms and style or with the people? And if it’s the people, what are we feeding them, fast food or good nourishment?
    Log in to Reply
  2. Bart Brush says

    February 3, 2015 at 7:28 pm

    Thank you Dan, for providing a partial insight into the mindset of contemporary Christian music.  I have long wondered why so many Christian radio stations ignore the great music of the past, while their speakers admonish us not to forget the ancient truths of the Word. 
     
    Richard,  I must take partial issue with your suggestion that hymns “can be arranged, keeping their authenticity, in a more relevant style.”  To me, this puts the words in a preferred position to the music, which is–to me–an equal  language (though a language without words).  Musically rearranging hymns may have its place, but only if it does not crowd out and gut important and powerful styles like Sacred Harp, with its “wrong” harmonies.  Some of this reminds me of the learned musicians who “corrected” Bach’s errors.  In my life, it was the music of the “Elijah” and “Ein Deutches Requiem” that made scripture palatable and worthy of consideration after an earlier rejection of what to me was a heavy-handed church. 
    Log in to Reply
  3. Kip White says

    February 3, 2015 at 3:55 pm

    I am grateful to read such a strong defence of using hymns in Church. I am from a profoundly conservative background, one that criticizes contemporary worship as being “an off-the-wall Church”, since most of these congregations have abandoned hymnals in favor of projection screens. Hymns are cherished for a reason: they engage our minds at a primal level while opening our understanding to the higher things of God. Again, from my background, priase choruses and contemporary music tend to fall into the category of vain repetition and “Jesus is my boyfriend” songs. I am not so harsh as that, but the constant repetition of the same phrase is hypnotic, not so much in a good way. We are told to test the spirits in the book of James. If these songs truly bring you closer to God, all I can say is Amen! However, as you have so beutifully pointed out, the lyrics to these great old hymns, and sometimes the circumstances behind their creation, are more moving than the euphoria reached by hyperventilation. The truthsand hope given and passed down through hymns and sacred songs are so powerful! Thank you for putting into words the best argument to teach these precious songs to our children and our children’s children.
    Log in to Reply
  4. Richard Cook says

    February 3, 2015 at 11:11 am

    Dan,
     
    What a great blog. I was a published writer in the early days of Contemporary Christian Music. (1970s-90s) (Still am published) At first we mixed the new songs with hymns. Eventually it seemed the contemporary took over. It is emotionally and esthetically attractive. I have actually heard the term from pastors criticizing an “old fashioned” song or style, while their preaching style seems pretty old fashioned. Continuing to use hymns (and can be arranged, keeping their authenticity, in a more relevant style) kind of grounds the more emotionally stimulating “hip” music.  There is music being written today that has substance, and that’s awesome. But music to just stimulate emotions certainly needs to be grounded with songs with textual substance. By the way, there was some old “hip” music of it’s day that was primarily used to stir up the crowd. So it has a place. But needs to be coupled with standards of the faith for sure. 
     
    I’m old now, but I was young once. And we sang hymns that were 100 years old then as well as newer songs (choruses we called them). So we may be under estimating young people thinking they need everything hip, when actually I think they too, as any other soul can come close to God through anointed hymns, spiritual songs and choruses.
    Log in to Reply
  5. Jackson Hearn says

    February 3, 2015 at 10:11 am

    Amen! I’m in a musically conservative church, one that values and appreciates hymnody – both new and old! I also think there is a place in our worship for the contemporary chorus. As a pastoral musician, I want to encourage the congregation to praise, but also to learn and grow intellectually as well as emotionally. I love to quote the apostle Paul, who wrote to the Corinthians, “I will sing with the Spirit, but I will sing with the understanding also.”
     
    I also appreciate the connection with all the saints before us who wrote and sang the “old” hymns. For that same reason, I try to find music from other cultures – global music – which can bring us into closer communion with Christians on the other side of the world. 
    Log in to Reply
  6. Ronald Richard Duquette says

    February 3, 2015 at 9:47 am

    I have to agree with the profound truths you have discovered in your journey, Dan.  I’m a much more “traditionalist” musician, and there are categories of hymns used within the Roman Catholic Church which frankly make me cringe now, as opposed to when I was 20 (I’m 62).  Although our choir here at Ft. Belvoir is called a “traditional” (vs. the contemporary) choir, we do a mix:  everything from what I sometimes jokingly refer to as Catholic Standard Hymns Nos. 1, or 2, or 3 (“Holy God, We Praise Thy Name,” “Holy, Holy, Holy,” etc. that EVERY congregation in the ’50s and ’60s knew and sang, Sunday after Sunday, ad infinitumj ad nauseam), or those hymns from the Protestant general tradition – BUT – all joking aside, I try to make similar points to what you make with your choirs today.  “It Is Well with My Soul” moves me endlessly close to tears when I think about the story of Spafford, and I shared that with my choir, who hadn’t heard it before; now, they sing it with a deeper appreciation of what it means to “put it in the hands of Jesus.”  We did that hymn last Sunday, a cappella, with the congregation’s participation – they weren’t real clear on the verse, but the refrain, they got it – and it was profoundly moving to hear.  In addition, we do anthems from the broad range of the Church’s treasury – not only those from the Roman tradition, but from Geneva (Louis Bourgeois), the Anglican (Tallis), and others, including the Orthodox.  NOT to do this kind of music is to not only rob the congregation of the fuller awareness of the riches of these traditions, to which they are entitled as sons and daughters of God, but it is to impoverish ourselves as musicians and ministers.  The complaint which sometimes comes to us in doing works from a different linguistic origin is “the congregation won’t understand it; so why do it?”  Why is it, then – and “why” is the appropriate question – that Gregorian chant moves so many people?  Clearly, most of the words are incomprehensible today – how many of us (outside the Vatican) speak ANY variety of Latin? – and yet, people sense the movement to the Divine that is implicit in all that music.  A priest of my acquaintance once said at Mass that he was convinced that the language of Heaven was sung music, as Scripture itself says that the angels continually circle around God’s throne, SINGING “Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord of Hosts!”  So we had better do our prep work here, in any number of genres, shouldn’t we?
     
    Ron Duquette
    Director, Woodlawn Chapel Catholic Choir
    Ft. Belvoir, VA
    Log in to Reply
  7. Thomas Seniow says

    February 3, 2015 at 5:04 am

    Great blog, Dan. You give us a good reminder to choose hymns and anthems based on the scripture of the day, theme of the worship service, or sermon topic and not on musical style. By doing that we allow our congregations, our choirs, and occasionally-stubborn music directors to experience enriching and sometimes new and different music, whether that be old or new.
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

https://celebrating-grace.com/

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Busy Times
  • ChoralEd, Basic Audio Setup
  • Between the Staves: Choral Questions, Candid Answers
  • Choral Ethics Guest Blog: Regarding Women in Classical Music History
  • Choral Ethics: Should We Be Responsible for Other People’s Happiness?

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy