• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / GUEST BLOG: “C.S. Lewis & Church Music” by Thomas Vozzella

GUEST BLOG: “C.S. Lewis & Church Music” by Thomas Vozzella

October 2, 2014 by Scott Dorsey Leave a Comment


C.S. LEWIS & CHURCH MUSIC by Thomas Vozzella
 
I recently came across this essay by C. S. Lewis entitled On Church Music from the book * Christian Reflections. It does not need much introduction as C. S. Lewis has been a voice in the Christian community for decades. Yet, I have never read his views on music in the church. I found it insightful and apropos, especially being several decades old and remains relevant today…you decide.
 
Musical Taste “There are two musical situations on which I think we can be confident that a blessing rests. One is where a priest or an organist, himself a man of trained and delicate taste, humbly and charitably sacrifices his own (aesthetically right) desires and gives the people humbler and coarser fare than he would wish, in a belief (even, as it may be, the erroneous belief) that he can thus bring them to God. The other is where the stupid and unmusical layman humbly and patiently, and above all silently, listens to music which he cannot, or cannot fully, appreciate, in the belief that it somehow glorifies God, and that if it does not edify him this must be his own defect. Neither such a High Brow nor such a Low Brow can be far out of the way. To both, Church Music will have been a means of grace; not the music they have liked, but the music they have disliked. They have both offered, sacrificed, their taste in the fullest sense. But where the opposite situation arises, where the musician is filled with the pride of skill or the virus of emulation and looks with contempt on the unappreciative congregation, or where the unmusical, complacently entrenched in their own ignorance and conservatism, look with the restless and resentful hostility of an inferiority complex on all who would try to improve their taste – there, we may be sure, all that both offer is unblessed and the spirit that moves them is not the Holy Ghost.”
 
Musical Intention – “It seems to me that we must define rather carefully the way, or ways, in which music can glorify God. There is … a sense in which all natural agents, even inanimate ones, glorify God continually by revealing the powers He has given them. And in that sense we, as natural agents, do the same. On that level our wicked actions, in so far as they exhibit our skill and strength, may be said to glorify Good, as well as our good actions. An excellently performed piece of music, as natural operation which reveals in a very high degree the peculiar powers given to man, will thus always glorify God whatever the intention of the performers may be. But that is a kind of glorifying which we share with the ‘dragons and great deeps’, with the ‘frost and snows’. What is looked for in us, as men, is another kind of glorifying, which depends on intention. How easy or how hard it may be for a whole choir to preserve that intention through all the discussions and decisions, all the corrections and the disappointments, all the temptations to pride, rivalry and ambition, which precede the performance of a great work, I (naturally) do not know. But it is on the intention that all depends. When it succeeds, I think the performers are the most enviable of men; privileged while mortals to honor God like angels and, for a few golden moments, to see spirit and flesh, delight and labour, skill and worship, the natural and the supernatural, all fused into that unity they would have had before the Fall.”
 
(N.B. * This was taken from an essay entitled “On Church Music” by C. S. Lewis. It can be found in a current publication called Christian Reflections published by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.; ISBN: 0802808697)

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Ronald Richard Duquette says

    October 6, 2014 at 9:38 am

    I have to admit that, looking at the first paragraph, I wasn’t sure I was going to have any degree of agreement with Mr. Lewis.  But by the end of the second full paragraph, I had to agree, as hard as it is, sometimes, to remember the REAL reason we’re supposed to be doing this.  It isn’t a particularly popular approach, especially among musicians, to examine the intention behind the presenting of the music which should be at base in their choice of music for the Church.  I have to admit, as a choir director myself, that weekly music choices often present a(n often uneasy) compromise between my personal preferences, those of the worshiping community, and the message of the day.  How much of traditional hymnody should we be singing?  How much “contemporary” (in the Catholic Church, too often that means music written between 1966 and 1986, or as I refer to it, the “Glory and Praise” music of the song collection of the same title) music should I include for the baby boomers in the church, who grew up with it – but who love it, and are willing to sing it?  If I include truly “contemporary” music (i.e., written in the last 15-20 years), what risk is there that the congregation won’t know it, and in too many instances, won’t care to learn it?  Do I dare take anything out of the Treasury of the Church’s Music – i.e., pieces by Byrd, Tallis, Mozart, Bruckner – in the hopes that someone, somewhere, in that community might take a step closer to God by LISTENING to music which may not be in a language they can understand?  What Mr. Lewis wrote so eloquently can be reduced, not necessarily well, to what I try to remind my choristers periodically:  “Our job is to help one person take one step closer to God.  We may not ever know when that happened, but it if does, it’s what we’re supposed to do.”  This is why I resist the description of what happens musically in any divine liturgy in the Church as being a “performance” – because that idea comes far too close to pride in self.  I prefer to think of it as “presentation” – of a gift that, like those of the Magi at the Epiphany, are not necessary, but return to God what is His.
     
    Ron
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Busy Times
  • ChoralEd, Basic Audio Setup
  • Between the Staves: Choral Questions, Candid Answers
  • Choral Ethics Guest Blog: Regarding Women in Classical Music History
  • Choral Ethics: Should We Be Responsible for Other People’s Happiness?

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy