• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / Accountability: Check Days

Accountability: Check Days

November 4, 2012 by Joshua Bronfman Leave a Comment


So I posted last week about my perspective on the use (or disuse) of sectionals in my auditioned ensembles. The next level of accountability for me is check days, also known as quartet (or octet) testing, where singers get up in class and have to sing the selected piece, one on a part. It can be quite a terrifying experience, but most invaluable. Not only are the singers more motivated to learn the music, the process can shed some valuable light on who the strongest and the weakest members of a group are.

One critical piece to help make check days successful is to shift some of the responsibility for evaluating singer performance away from me and onto the students. Thus, as Richard Sparks wrote about, you hopefully create a culture within your ensemble where everyone feels accountable to everyone else, not just the director. So, during check days, I mix up what I do in various ways:

  • Grade them myself. Usually pass/fail. If they fail, they need to make it up sometime in the next week, and it must be outside of class, and they need to gather the necessary three (or more often seven) other people to retake the test. After that, course grades get lowered.
  • Everyone grades. The singers grade the other singers in their section. I average the grades and that determines whether they need to retake. Sometimes, if I think the kids missed failing someone, I might intervene (my kids are always kinder to their peers. They never fail someone who deserved to pass), but most often, I defer to the kids.
  • One student grades the whole section. This one is tricky, as it can create ill will. But with the right kids – they must have impeccable musical chops, have full respect of their peers, and be natural, mature, leader-types – these can be quite successful.
  • Crash-and-Burn. A local high school teacher taught me this one. It goes like this: Sing until you get lost or really mess up and have to drop out. If you make it to measure 10, you are guaranteed a D; if you get to measure 20, a C; measure 30 a B, and if you make it through the whole piece without dropping out, you get an A. In a way, this takes the responsibility off you and the other students, and just places it squarely on the singer's shoulders. They effectively grade themselves when they drop out.
  • Solo. Come to my office, one-on-one, and sing from point X to Y of my choosing, with no other help. No way around this one…either you know it or you don't. This is actually the most effective in terms of getting them to learn their parts. The results at the next rehearsal after testing speak for themselves.
  • No Ramifications. Just do it in class. One to a part. Let them know in advance. People will practice more. A few won't care about the public part of not knowing their music, but most will. This works for college choirs, but it also is a way to do check days with community groups.

Let's hear from the Choralnet community of some other ideas for individual accountability.

 

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Richard Sparks says

    November 8, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Some questions, Joshua–is this a regular part of your grading procedure? How often to you do it (once a term? more often?)? Actually, since you said “check days,” I assume it IS more often, so how do you judge when to use it? Is it often in class (obviously some are and some aren’t from your description, but how do you decide how often to do)?
     
    Again, love the post and ideas!
    Log in to Reply
  2. Richard Sparks says

    November 6, 2012 at 9:33 am

    Joshua,
     
    That’s a fabulous list of possibilities–some of which I’ll be sure to steal!
     
    I have a check day coming up Monday (about a week out from the concert) and will have them in my office in quartets, with random samplings from the repertoire. As you say, this is about accountability–their sense that their own contribution is critical. Mine for this concert isn’t for grade, but I’ll think about your various methods for grading, which are all terrific.
     
    Thanks for the great ideas.
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics:”…….and the tongue of the dumb shall sing”
  • Choral Ethics: Why Music?
  • ChoralEd, Performing Choral Music – Nigeria – Jude Nwankwo
  • The Conductor as Yogi: “The Only”
  • Choral Ethics: Being Grateful

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2025 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy