• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / CJ Replay: The Conductor’s Personality Type

CJ Replay: The Conductor’s Personality Type

April 24, 2012 by Scott Dorsey Leave a Comment


(From the Choral Journal article, “The Psychologist and the Conductor: Solving Rehearsal Problems Using Awareness of Personality Types,” by Barbara Pollack and Harriet Simons)
 
       Why do some rehearsals energize conductors while others drain them? Some rehearsals cry out for a celebration afterward; others induce headaches, anger, insomnia, and the like. What can conductors do when they experience periods of uncertainty and self-doubt before, during, or after rehearsals? By focusing inward, they often can find the resources needed to deal with not feeling right about certain aspects of their rehearsals, personal dynamics of rehearsals. Both have worked in this area prior to this collaboration.
       Conductors, like other administrators of complex organizations, must communicate well with a number of people in a variety of situations. Administrators’ leadership skills, including interpersonal communication, are crucial to their effectiveness. Since choral ensembles include people who exhibit various personality characteristics, conductors face an additional challenge.  Furthermore, aspects of managing an ensemble outside of rehearsal, such as planning, scheduling, interacting with staff members and dealing with conflict are relatively more or less difficult to accomplish, depending on the conductor’s personality type.
 

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Ronald Richard Duquette says

    May 10, 2012 at 8:22 am

    As someone familiar with Personality Types in the Jungian mold (Myers-Briggs) from both personal reading and having been “identified” as a particular type via testing while in the Army (yes, would you believe?), I firmly believe that such models can be terrifcally useful to any of us in whatever endeavor we engage.  I would, however, like to see a more thorough examination of the types in the rehearsal room – we can draw some broad conclusions from the type descriptions (I, for example, an ENFJ, have a pretty clear idea what the type means, but not necessarily how it proceeds in a rehearsal room – does sound a lot like an “E”, doesn’t it?  “Give me an outside perspective!”), but having the critical outsider’s eye thrown on the type, it could give some really useful pointers.  Is this study in the 1996 Journal more elaborated upon by the author?  Anyone know?
     
    Ron
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Don’t Waste My Time!
  • Choral Ethics: Judging Others
  • Choral Ethics: Doing the Right Things
  • Choral Ethics: Working Together
  • The Conductor as Yogi:  The Calmest Person in the Room

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy