• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds
You are here: Home / Others / CJ Replay: Dawson and the Copyright Act

CJ Replay: Dawson and the Copyright Act

February 13, 2012 by Scott Dorsey Leave a Comment


No twentieth-century composer of choral music has experienced more copyright infringements than William L. Dawson. In the past three years more than 10 new publications have appeared on the market in which arrangers have either consciously or subconsciously “borrowed” compositional and textual ideas invented by Dawson. Melodic, rhythmic, and harmonic motives from Dawson’s arrangement of There is a Balm in Gilead have appeared without authorization or permission, as the creation of other arrangers in no less than 12 hymnals and sacred song collections. One might consider it a compliment that other arrangers/composers find the Dawson works so fascinating and unique that they incorporate materials from the copyrighted compositions into their own arrangements. In the Baroque era such borrowing from other composers or re-using material from earlier, and sometimes quite different works was quite normal. This was a practice fairly widespread in a period when themes were largely fashioned on prototypes and when originality was measured as much in terms of craftsmanship as of melodic invention. Handel and Bach both re-used their old music as it suited their needs. The practice was justified by the extent to which the “borrowed” material was refashioned.
 
(From the Choral Journal article “William Dawson and the Copyright Act,” by John Haberlen)
 

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John Bickerton says

    March 6, 2012 at 8:55 am

    It is not illegal to make a musical arrangement of an existing work if the arranger has received the necessary permissions from the work’s publisher.  It is hard to know from this post where permissions were not gained or what the infringement is.  Infringement is a legal matter and proving it requires a careful, sometimes miniscule, examination of the original vs the suspect works.  Granted this is just a blurb and the original article may go into more depth.
     
    When it comes to recordings, it is interesting to note  that royalties will only be paid to an arranger if the arranged work is in the public domain and possesses sufficient originality that it may be considered a new composition and thus, protected by copyright.  
     
    The recording of an arranged song that is still under copyright would only gain royalties for the original writers and their publisher (not the arranger).  
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

Advertise on ChoralNet

On This Day
September 23

Christopher Willibald Gluck’s opera “Armide” was first staged, at the second Salle du Palais-Royal in Paris, on this day in 1777.

Would you like to submit a blog post for consideration?

Are you interested in becoming a regular ChoralNet blogger? Please contact us at .

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Choral Ethics: Monstering
  • A&C Monthly Blog: Reclaiming Relevance (a focus on building audiences)
  • The Conductor as Yogi: The Energy Drain of Judgment
  • ChorTeach Summer 2023
  • How to Voice Your Choir Quickly & Effectively

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2023 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy