• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

You are here: Home / Others / The Discipline of Teams

The Discipline of Teams

September 29, 2011 by Tim Sharp Leave a Comment


This fall I have been particularly attentive to team-building. As I observe my daughter's varsity women's volleyball team move from a group of skilled players in their pre-season play, to becoming an actual functioning team in their current conference competitions, I have applied some of the concepts observed to my work at team building in the ACDA National Office.
 
But first, a definition for a team. Building a team is not merely a motivating label or an energy building campaign. Team building is an advanced stage of collaboration.
 
A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and common approach, for which they hold themselves mutually accountable.
 
Here is what I have observed about building a team:
 
*Successful teams establish urgency, demanding performance standards, and direction;
 
While it is true that some teams have coaches, and the team relies on the coach for urgency, standards, and direction, teams can also establish these elements by concensus.
 
*Successful teams select members for skill and skill potential, not personality;
 
I am confident the girls on my daughter's volleyball team would not have selected each other had they just picked friends from their individual social groups for the team. They were drawn together by a shared set of skills. Interestingly, however, they have transcended their teenage social structure and discovered the richness of each other's individual personalities through common interest and skill.
 
*Successful teams pay particular attention to first meetings and actions;
 
The tone of the season was set early-on, as individuals brought their best game to the collaborative effort. Further, they determine from the outset what they want to accomplish and what it is going to take to get there.
 
*Successful teams set clear rules of behavior and action;
 
Attitude, behavior, attendance expectations, schedule–all of these rules were stated up front, and ongoing participation meant understanding and accepting the rules from the outset.
 
*Successful teams set and seize-upon a few immediate performance-oriented tasks and goals;
 
It was important for the team to start acting like a team, and to start achieving the goals of the team for both affirmation and encouragement. Even when the scoreboard did not favor their team, they knew when they performed well and had accomplished some of their practice goals.
 
*Successful teams challenge each other with fresh facts and information;
 
A successful volleyball team talks to each other during play, and they talk a lot. They call shots, claim positions, and encourage each other, whether they score or not.
 
*Successful teams spend a good amount of time together;
 
I noticed early that the girls would eat dinner together, have sleepovers with each other, and go to other team games as a group. I have now cooked one breakfast and one dinner for 20 teenage girls this season, and I have observed first-hand their off-court affirmation and enjoyment of each other.
 
*Successful teams exploit the power of positive feedback, recognition, and reward.
 
I don't think I will ever loose the image of the girls affirming each other after one of them serves out of bounds, or another spikes a ball into their own court on a return shot. To see the girls give positive feedback after absolute failure is as rewarding to me as anything I see on the court.
 
While there is no guaranteed how-to recipe for building team performance, the above characteristics will go a long way to help the successful process.
 

Filed Under: Others

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Gary Weidenaar says

    October 4, 2011 at 9:04 am

    Thanks, Tim,
     
    So true!
     
    I have patterned my philosophy after coaches and sports teams for most of my career.
     
    My current ”mentor” is Coach K of Duke basketball (Mike  Krzyzewski).   His book, “Leading With The Heart” is chock-full of concepts which work for building a choir as well as a basketball team.  He was surprised, but flattered when I wrote him to tell him that he was my unknowing mentor – especially so, since he is not a singer (by his own admission).
     
    His is but one book of the many I have read by coaches or about coaches over the years.  A partial list is below.  For sports aficionados, I’ve only listed the teams they were with at the time I read the book.  For everyone, some of the coaches actions have shown me what NOT to do, along with what TO do.
     
    Lou Holtz (Notre Dame football)
    Chuck Daly (Detroit Pistons Pro basketball)
    Woody Hayes (The Ohio State University football – read after he was fired_
    Bo Schembechler (University of Michigan football)
    Pat Riley (Los Angeles Lakers and New York Pro basketball)
    Bobby Knight (Indiana University basketball)
    Phil Jackson (Chicago Bulls and Los Angeles Lakers Pro basketball)
    Vince Lombardi (Green Bay Packers Pro football)
     
    Good Choirs are similar to sports teams  in many conceptual ways:  trust of each other, motivation, recruiting, goal setting, morale, expectations, skill building, organization, performance under pressure, and perhaps most of all – working together for a common purpose.
     
    As an example, the CWU Chamber Choir had a retreat last Friday and Saturday.  This is my fifth retreat with the choir.  On Saturday morning, we began with me leading what has become an annual one-hour tae kwon do session.  On Friday night, I wondered out loud if that hour would be better spent learning notes than learning tae kwon do.  I’m not sure if the word sacrilegious applies here, but I’m pretty sure that blasphemous does – because that’s what my suggestion was considered by the choir.   So tae kwon do it was!
     
    Which brings me to one final important concept – TRADITION!   (imagine it sung in *my*  best Fiddler On the Roof voice, NOT Coach K’s!)
     
    While he may not be a singer, Coach K DID almost get fired for a complete season with only a couple of wins early in his career .  And he DID almost have to give up coaching, ending up in the hospital for a good chunk of time due to the effects of stress and overwork.  He has come back from both of those things is to win multiple national championships and forge a philosophy of life which allows handling of stress and work.  His experiences, to which there are parallels in my life, serve to instruct, motivate and inspire me.
     
    So reading about coaches is not just about helping choirs . . . .
     
    best,
    Gary
    Director of Choral Studies
    Central Washington University
    Log in to Reply
  2. Tom Carter says

    October 4, 2011 at 9:02 am

    Tim,
     
    Thanks so much for your thoughts on this; I sure appreciate you and your leadership of ACDA.
     
    A related thought: I once worked for a school that supposedly valued teamwork. As I quickly discovered, what they really valued was compliance–when a supervisor told you to do something, you needed to do it without question or be branded “not a team player.” Even if you knew to your core that what you were being told to do was not a best practice, and not in the best interest of the students.
     
    They would have agreed with many of your characteristics (while hating the “challenge each other with fresh facts and information”). Their main “team motivator” is holding up their school as “the best,” and suggesting that our purpose is to adhere to the school and all its tenets … especially the adherence to performance standards and common goals. Unfortunately, this adherence to “purpose” is only the third of what Dan Pink writes/speaks about when he discusses human motivation. His top two elements that motivate us are autonomy and mastery. I would suggest that the volleyball team members have autonomy and mastery — they have independence within their position and they have clear opportunities and desires to master their skills.
     
    But the school I’m talking about values neither autonomy nor mastery. Since these are such important aspects of motivation, I’m attaching a great RSAnimate talk by Dan Pink.
     
    Warmest regards,
     
    Tom
    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter

Advertise on ChoralNet

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • The Conductor as Yogi:  A Different View of the Candle at Both Ends
  • Choral Ethics: Don’t Shoot the Piano Player
  • Choral Ethics: What is Choral Ethics?
  • Choral Ethics: April is Autism Awareness Month
  • Choral Ethics: Almost There

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2026 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy