I have a visceral – and not necessarily positive – reaction to the term “curriculum.”
Shudder. . . !
I envision a fusty, prim old schoolmarm type glaring at me over the top of her wire-rimmed glasses scolding me for failing to dot some preposterous “i” or cross a meaningless “t” in some pointless accreditation document that no one will ever read. Dopey me, I always thought we were supposed to design ways to help our students not waste time jumping through inane hoops ordained by some apparatchik drone.
It seems author Alan Gumm agrees. Writing in Michigan’s Bella Voce, Mr. Gumm takes a pragmatic approach to what is genuinely NEEDED in a choral curriculum. In his article, “A Broader View of Choral Curriculum in Today’s World,” Alan discusses the curriculum from the perspective of appropriate pedagogy, forward-looking program development, and solid choral artistry. Among his salient points are:
[1] Using repertoire as a teaching tool
[2] Ensemble concepts
[3] Vocal technique
[4] Musicianship
[5] Long-range development
[6] Four-year rotation
[7] General music in the choral curriculum (listen & analyze, music history & theory)
[8] Movement & Creativity
[9] The role of small ensembles
Alan summarizes by saying, “Contrary to the notion that a curriculum is a list of dry ideas on a shelf, the choral curriculum should live and breathe and grow with the developing program at any school.”
How refreshing!
(To access the full article, simply click the highlighted title. For additional articles on a dazzling array of choral topics, visit ChorTeach.)
Alan Gumm says
John Howell says