Comment re MusicEase notation software

Comment from user: On a separate note, I know people who use Finale. To my eye, the scores they produce are quite poor— the default staff lines are thin, only 3 dots of a 600 dpi score; the default vertical bars are the same thickness as the staff lines, the staff spacing is quite rigid, and seems to have no inter-staff collision avoidance. Greenway Music Press require their editors to submit scores in Finale, and the Greenway publications are sub-standard IMO.

MusicEase Pro, on the other hand, produces by default scores that are uncannily similar to my late 19th c./early 20th c. engraved scores from Leduc, Barenreiter, etc. I don’t understand why MusicEase Pro is very rarely mentioned in blogs or surveys of music engraving software.

Our response: The fact that we at MusicEase Software have no paid advertising probably has something to do with it.