• Sign In
  • ACDA.org
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
ChoralNet

ChoralNet

The professional networking site for the global online choral community.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ACDA News
  • Events
  • Community
    • Announcements
    • Classifieds

Curriculum and Instruction

Leading Voices: Adapting Specs Grading for the Virtual and Hybrid Choral Classroom

September 23, 2020 by Brian O Ackles Leave a Comment

As I start the Fall semester, I find myself right where I left off at the end of last year – trying to keep my students engaged in a virtual high school choral program. This year, my high school moved to a two-semester scheduling system with students taking four classes per semester in 80 minutes blocks.  For the first semester, I will each all my choir students online.  For the second semester, most choir will return to in-person ensemble rehearsals, with some students choosing to remain virtual for the entire year. 

A New Syllabus for a New Time

With my new teaching schedule this year, and no concerts in sight, it was time to revise my teaching philosophy a bit and rewrite the choir syllabus.  The biggest challenge I am now facing in adapting my syllabus is trying to cultivate student interest and excitement while at the same time creating a new grading system that maintains high expectations while also acknowledges the present situation.

Small Teaching Online

I first discovered Specification Grading or Specs Grading last Spring while reading Small Teaching Online by Flower Darby with James M. Lang.  At the time, I was mainly focused on keeping my students engaged and participating in online high school vocal music.   In chapter 7, Creating Autonomy, Darby presents several strategies to help the students become more aware of their responsibility and take control of their learning.


Specs Grading

In her book Specifications Grading, Linda Nilson presents a grading system that develops a learning-centered environment that focuses on students learning outcomes and student autonomy.  Specs grading is a competency-based grading system that incorporates a pass/fail system of assessment.  I know that sounds a bit harsh, but it is not. 

With Specs Grading, students must now read all the specifications needed to achieve a specific grade, select the grade they would like to earn, and then fulfill all the requirements to show competency for a given course or assignment.  Here is an example of specs for a calculus class:

https://rtalbert.org/return-to-specs-grading-calculus/

Why Consider Specs Grading

In an excellent post titled What is Specification Grading and why should You consider Using it?, Macie Hall provides an overview of Specifications Grading and the fifteen ways Specs Grading will:

  1. Uphold high academic standards,
  2. Reflect student learning outcomes,
  3. Motivate students to learn,
  4. Motivate students to excel,
  5. Discourage cheating,
  6. Reduce student stress,
  7. Make students feel responsible for their grades,
  8. Minimize conflict between faculty and students,
  9. Save faculty time,
  10. Give students feedback they will use,
  11. Make expectations clear,
  12. Foster higher-order cognitive development and creativity,
  13. Assess authentically,
  14. Achieve high interrater agreement,
  15. Be simple.

Introduction Video for Specs Grading


Start with Simple Specs

This year, I am incorporating and modifying the fundamental elements of Spec Grading with my virtual and hybrid high school choir students. In chapter nine, Developing A Course with Specs Grading (p. 115), Nilson suggests teachers may want to “start small” and create a synthetic grading system that incorporates both specs and traditional grading.  I decided to start with “Simple Specs.”

With Simple Specs, student grades are earned by following and completing simple assignment directions and procedures.  Specifications for grades are always included in the assignment instructions, and within a Google Classroom assignment, you can create a rubric.

Google Classroom Assignment 2, “TikTok” Video Introduction Rubric


Move Towards Complex Specs

Later this semester, I will slowly increase the rigor of assignments, and the specs will become more challenging.  See the attached document.

Hagenberg_Self_Sprint_SpecsDownload

Tokens – Adding Flexibility for Your Students

Think of tokens as a safety net that gives students a way to bend the rules just a bit – a kind of assignment currency.  If, at some time during the semester, a student gets behind, would like to resubmit an assignment, or they need a “sanity break,” students can take advantage and redeem one of the following tokens.  Each student will begin the semester with 1 Oops Token and 1 Sanity Token. 

Oops Token – Students may exchange these tokens to 1. Revise or resubmit an unsatisfactory assignment, or 2. Extend an assignment due date.

Sanity Token – Students redeem this token to be excused from one assignment (sometimes, we all could use a break).

Earn-A-Oops Token – Throughout the year, choir members will also have the opportunity to earn extra Oops tokens by completing additional student or teacher-initiated assignments/activities. Some opportunities will be announced, and some will not.

A Few Words of Caution

To successfully implement Specs Grading, educators need to take great care in developing and writing class assignments and specification criteria.  It does take more time and planning to become secure and confident in addressing specific learning standards and student outcomes for a given assignment.  

When creating Specs Grading criteria, students must understand the assignment specifications, and students must know precisely what to do to make their work acceptable. (Nilson, 2014, p. 57)

Teacher modeling is a must!

Some students may also become anxious as they learn the new grading system.  With the pass/fail aspect of fulfilling all the requirements needed to earn a specific grade, there is no more bargaining for more points. Either the student satisfied all the requirements, or they did not – it is very black and white.  It may take a while for students to understand the nonnegotiable.

Specs Grading also requires teachers to remain aware of and actively monitor student engagement and progress.  We need to provide support and encouragement to students who may lack confidence and decide to shoot low and only try for a B or C.  Mindful awareness of scaffolding specifications will help students become more confident and successful.

Conclusion – Specs Grading and the Virtual and Hybrid Choral Program

Last Monday, I graded my first assignment using Specs Grading – most outstanding!  In about 30 minutes, I was able to review the Google Sheet, apply the specs, grade their work, and enter 72 grades into SchoolTool.  But better than that, 83% of my students completed the assignment on time and achieved the grade they were shooting for. 

It is my hope that implementing Specs Grading this year will help me create more meaningful assignments, offer students a sense of ownership of their school work, and support this year’s virtual and hybrid choral music program.

References

What is Specifications Grading and Why Should You Consider Using It?

Yes, Virginia, There’s a Better Way to Grade

Specifications grading: We may have a winner

Specifications grading with the EMRF rubric

Advocating a new way of grading

Brown, P. C., Roediger III. H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it Stick. Harvard University Press.

https://phil.ucalgary.ca/manageprofile/sites/phil.ucalgary.ca.manageprofile/files/unitis/courses/PHIL379/F2017/LEC1/PHIL379-F2017-LEC1-outline.pdf

Filed Under: Curriculum and Instruction Tagged With: ADIF - Agile Development Instructional Framework, The Agile Centered Classroom

Leading Voices: Teaching and Singing While Wearing a Mask: Why it is a Challenge and How to Make it Better.

September 9, 2020 by Brian O Ackles 1 Comment

The picture below is of one of our colleagues who is currently teaching middle school vocal music in San Antonio, Texas.  Vicke, like most of us, was thrown into distance learning last Spring, learned more technology in the past six months than during her entire career, and now will be teaching vocal music with personal protective equipment this Fall.  Even with the challenges of PPE, she has a remarkable attitude and great plans in place for her students this year.  Good luck Vicke, and good luck to us all.

Vicke King, Choir Director
Wallace B Jefferson Middle School

My First Experience Singing With a Mask

This past Spring was the first time I sang with a mask, and it was very disheartening.  I was at church singing two verses for our opening hymn for one of our live stream services.  I remember thinking to myself, “I can’t do this – this will never work.”  

Everything felt so different.  When I took a breath, the mask was drawn into my mouth.  As I sang, it felt like my voice was contained in the mask.  My ears searched for the normal auditory feedback from the sanctuary, but I sensed very little acoustical response.

And the worst part of it all was what I did instinctively to overcompensate for all the new sensations I was experiencing. When I sang the next hymn, I found myself breathing shallow, really pushing my voice through the mask, and waaaaaay overdoing my diction.  By the end of the service, I felt vocally, emotionally, and professionally defeated.

https://medium.com/block-street-journal

If I was vocally and emotionally drained after leading three hymns during a one-hour church service, how would I ever be able to teach and sing five days a week next year?  And retirement is not an option – yet.

Searching for Answers

After my mask incident at church, I started searching for the answer to my question and began collecting information and research related to wearing masks.  I looked for information regarding PPE masks and its effect on spoken communication and any other good advice that might be available.  What I found was that there is very little research regarding teaching or singing with a PPE mask. 

To help me navigate through the current information, I asked my sister in law, Susan Butterfoss M.A., who is an ASHA Certified Clinical Speech-Language Pathologist for her assistance.  She is an experienced speech pathologist, vocalist, and voice therapist in Central New Jersey.  Susan and I spent the last month collaborating on this blog.

" data-type="URL" data-id="Susan.Butterfoss@gmail.com">

Together, we uncovered four areas in which PPE masks negatively affect spoken and sung communication.  The four areas of concern are Reduced Decibel Levels, Attenuated Frequencies, Diminished Word Boundaries, and Blocked Facial Cues.  Each specific area of concern may not seem too discouraging on their own. Still, when they come together, they create the perfect storm for a loss of quality of spoken/sung communication and possible vocal fatigue for students and teachers. 

1. Reduced Decibels Levels


Decibel X:dB Sound Level Meter

The mean decibel level of conversational speech is around 60 dB.  Masks can attenuate sounds ranging from 3 to 4 dB for simple medical masks, to 12 dB for the N95 masks (The Hearing Review).  So, if we start a teacher’s standard conversational speaking volume at 60 dB and subtract 8 dB for the mask, we are left with 52 dB. That’s not too bad.  BUT, if we then bring in the average classroom noise level of 33 dB, the teachers’ spoken volume is now only 19 dB above the learning environment.  Not terrible, but not good. 

2. Attenuated Frequencies

The Hearing Review also reports that PPE masks filter the high frequency speaking sounds that range from 2000-7000 Hz.  These unvoiced consonances (see below) are significantly weakened or lost when wearing a mask. Vowels and voiced consonants will always be perceived stronger and understood better than unvoiced consonants – mask or no mask.  This is part of the reason why people sound like they are mumbling when talking through a mask.  Still not terrible news, but not good. 


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Speech_Banana_no_icons.png

3. Diminished Word Boundaries

Diminished perception of particular speech sounds results in a diminished perception of word boundaries.  Word boundaries are the perception of where one word ends and the next begins.  This is a critical component of spoken communication. Speech is continuous – one word connected to the next resulting in a “blur” due to the change in the initial and final sounds of words. This “blur” is of concern when masks weaken these sounds further and thus decay the delineation between words.  

4. Blocked Facial Cues


https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-use-the-7-38-55-rule-to-negotiate-effectively#quiz-0

Teaching with a face mask blocks the student’s visual access to the mouth and conceals potential facial cues.    Visual cues such as facial expression and articulation are used by listeners to fill in context for instruction and are now obstructed.  Many students are also at risk of missing information and losing instruction as they often rely on the teacher’s expression and visual input to sustain their focus.  For the education profession and especially music instruction, this is terrible news. 

Overcoming the Obstacles

Each of the four areas of concern in and of themselves don’t seem to be too difficult to deal with.  But when they are compounded, they create an obstacle that can seem overwhelming and even devastating to our profession.

“Never let a good crisis go to waste.”

Attributed to Sir Winston Churchill

The answer to this dilemma lies in our ability to adapt and adjust.  To make small modifications in our instruction that, when compounded, they create palatable solutions that will see us through the pandemic while at the same time strengthening our instruction.  Below you will find strategies for each of the four areas of concern.  To be successful, each area must be addressed.

“Alone we can do so little.  Together we can do so much”

Hellen Keller

1. Strategies to Compensate for Reduced Decibel Levels

  1. Reduce competing environmental noise and distractions as much as possible.
  2. Check for understanding.
    • Confirm students can hear the speaker.
    • Ask participants to repeat important information or instructions.
    • Ask participants to re-state an idea in their own words.
  3. Investigate using a classroom sound system or purchasing a personal amplification system.

2. Strategies to Compensate for Attenuated Frequencies

  1. Develop procedures and techniques to cultivate group focus and attention.
  2. Compensate for diminished word boundaries by attending to the articulation of initial and final word sounds and slowing speech rate.
  3. CAUTION!  Avoid developing bad compensatory habits that can hurt the voice, such as an abrasive glottal attack/onset, and singing or speaking too loudly. 

3. Strategies to Improve Diminished Word Boundaries

  1. Increase attention to the precision of articulation – especially in the initial and final position of words and unvoiced sounds such as p / f / th / t / s / sh / k / ch / h.
  2. Know your speaking rate.  The Average Speaking Rate and Words per Minute for English speakers in the United States is about 150 wpm (words per minute).  Presentations such as TEDx Talks average around 100 – 150 wpm.

4. Strategies to Improve Blocked Facial Cues

  1. Maintain a direct visual line of communication between speaker and listener.  
  2. Increase eye expression and general gestures/pantomime as appropriate.
  3. Increase the use of visual references for all students – whiteboards, posters, flip charts, notes, etc.
  4. Trial transparent face masks or face shields – Transparent Face Mask with plastic shield

Handouts for Teachers and Vocalists

Specific exercises can improve resonance and vocal quality and are among the ways to help our words be understood, and our voices remain healthy and sustainable. The attached handouts provide teachers and vocalists with clinical insight from a speech pathologist’s perspective that is meant to help redirect our focus from what our voices sound like to what our voices feel like.  The instructions and exercises are intended to guide the speaker/singer to physical sensations and vocal approaches, which can help to produce a good, healthy voice.  The guidance provided is not a substitution for appropriate medical care for the voice.  Please consult your physician if you are experiencing pain, discomfort, or chronic changes in your voice.

A-Vocalist-Guide-to-Singing-with-a-MaskDownload
Vocal-Health-for-TeachersDownload

Conclusion: Teaching and Singing While Wearing a Mask

Speaking and singing while wearing a mask is incredibly challenging.  Although there is limited research thus far, we identified four aspects of singing and speech which are impacted by wearing a mask: masks diminish decibel levels, attenuate certain speech sounds, distort word boundaries, and block visual facial cues.  Together, these four concerns inhibit communication and put teachers and students at risk for developing harmful speaking and singing habits.

When teaching or singing with a mask, our first instinct may be to push and make our voices louder.  This, of course, is not sustainable or even a healthy way to be heard.  Our collaboration produced several recommendations to compensate for the mask.  These include slowing speech rate, attending to articulatory markers that identify word boundaries, and augmenting our spoken instruction with visual aids. 

Name that Mask

Below you will find four recordings of the fourth verse to the hymn, Praise, My Soul, The King of Heaven.  These recordings were recorded on Sunday, August 30, at the First Presbyterian Church of Skaneateles, in Skaneateles, New York.  After listening to all four recordings, rank your preference and see if you can distinguish between the following three masks (one recording is with no mask). The answers can be found at the end of this blog.  

Mask #1 – A Standard three-layered disposable single-use face mask.

Mask #2 – A two-layered cloth facemask that my daughter made for me.

Mask #3 – The Singers Mask from the Broadway Relief Project.

No Mask

References

Why Is It Hard To Understand Someone With A Mask On?

How Do Medical Masks Degrade Speech Reception?

The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss

Using Masks for In-Person Service Delivery During COVID-19: What to Consider

DESIGN OF AN AUTOMATIC WORD BOUNDARY DETECTION SYSTEM USING THE COUNTING RULE: A Thesis Defense

Personal Amplification Systems

Giecy Voice Amplifier Portable Bluetooth 30W 2800mAh Rechargeable PA System Speaker

ZOWEETEK Voice Amplifier with UHF Wireless Microphone Headset, 10W 1800mAh Portable Rechargeable PA system Speaker

Name that Mask Answers

Recording #1, disposable single-use face mask

Recording #2, No mask

Recording #3, The Singers Mask

Recording #4, Two-layered cloth mask

Filed Under: Curriculum and Instruction Tagged With: ADIF - Agile Development Instructional Framework

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • ACDA.org
  • The ChoralNet Daily Newsletter
Advertise on ChoralNet

On This Day
June 30

Giovanni Maria Sabino, Italian organist, composer, and educator, was born on this day in 1588.

Would you like to submit a blog post for consideration?

Are you interested in becoming a regular ChoralNet blogger? Please contact ACDA Director of Membership & Communications Sundra Flansburg at .

RSS JW Pepper

  • 5 Things to Consider When Buying Color Guard Equipment
  • PYO Music Institute Presents the 9th Annual Ovation Award in Partnership with J.W. Pepper, Jacobs Music, and WRTI 90.1 FM
  • 10 Easy-To-Learn Funky Tunes for the Stands
  • Zoom F3 Field Recorder Review: The Easiest Way to Get Pro Audio for Your Music Ensembles
  • J.W. Pepper Names Eric King as New Chief Financial Officer
  • The Music Teachers’ Guide to Recording an Ensemble: The Samson C02 Mics Review
  • The Zoom Q8n-4K Handy Video Recorder Review
  • Directors & Parents: Download Our New Contest & Festival Checklist
  • If You Love West Side Story, Listen to These!
  • The Music of Rita Moreno, a West Side Story Icon

RSS NAfME

  • Assessing the Standards: An Exploration of the Respond Model Cornerstone Assessment
  • Nearly Half of the 2023 GRAMMY Music Educator AwardTM Quarterfinalists Are NAfME Members
  • Reevaluating Professional Practice
  • The Importance of Knowledge Transfer in Music Education
  • Star-Songs and Constellations: Lessons from the Global Jukebox
  • NAfME Endorses the Reopen and Rebuild America’s Schools Act of 2021
  • 5 Things Teachers Can Do to Recharge over the Summer
  • 2022 Call for Applications: SRME Executive Committee
  • Yay Storytime! Musical Adventures with Children’s Picture Books, Part Sixteen
  • Yay Storytime! Musical Adventures with Children’s Picture Books, Part Fifteen

Footer

Connect with us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • ACDA.org

Recent Blogs

  • Gratitude for Those Who Serve in State Leadership
  • Midweek Meditation: The Inner Critic
  • K-12 Teaching: Repertoire Selections for School Choirs
  • Dropping the Covid Ball with Dr. Nikki Johnson
  • Choral Potpourri/Choral Ethics: Pretension

American Choral Directors Association

PO Box 1705
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73101-1705

© 2022 American Choral Directors Association. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy